1969 was a year that saw
several racially driven protests across college football teams in America, but
the loudest of them was started by Fred Milton of Oregon State University.
Milton was suspended from the team in February of 1969 after he was seen with a
mustache and goatee, which was a violation of a team policy against facial
hair. After learning of his
suspension, Milton went to speak with head coach Dee Andros, but after a
forty-minute meeting neither side would budge on the issue. Milton claimed that
the team policy against facial hair was a violation of his human rights and
argued that the coach’s decision to suspend him from the team was racially
driven. This was due to the fact that the suspension occurred during the
off-season, when many of the white players on the team were known to sport long
sideburns.
![]() |
Oregon State University Black Student Union walkout, 1969.
Image via Oregon State University Libraries
(Adapted from: The
Oregon Encyclopedia).
|
Milton would go on to
continue playing football and graduate from Utah State University before
playing in the Canadian Football League for a short time. If you would like to
learn more about the life of Fred Milton, I encourage you to read the article
about him, “Fred
Milton (1948 – 2011)”, published by The
Oregon Encyclopedia.
Coincidentally,
this incident took place only a few years after Gaudium et Spes was published, and I think that the protest
orchestrated by Fred Milton and the Oregon State University Black Student Union
is a perfect example of a peaceful protest which follows the principles
outlined in Gaudium et Spes. “ But
where citizens are oppressed by a public authority overstepping its competence,
they should not protest against those things which are objectively required for
the common good; but it is legitimate for them to defend their own rights and
the rights of their fellow citizens against the abuse of this authority, while
keeping within those limits drawn by the natural law and the Gospels”.
In
this case, the public authority overstepping its competence is the university,
and more specifically the football program. Obviously, Milton wasn’t hurting
anybody by having facial hair, so I don’t think that the protest was against
something “objectively required for the common good”, he was protesting a
violation of his rights and the rights of his fellow citizens on two levels.
First, Milton believed that the team policy against facial hair was a violation
of his human rights to begin with. On top of that though, the fact that the
team policy was not enforced in the same, zero-tolerance way for white athletes
as it was in this instance against Milton was a clear violation of his rights.
In response to this violation, Milton and the members of the Black Student
Union arranged a peaceful protest, clearly within “those limits drawn by the
natural law and the Gospels”, and while no sweeping changes were made on campus
in the short-term they certainly were part of the overall voice of the civil
rights movement, helping to make a real difference.

Your article has got me thinking about how this event I believe was fit into the style back in the the 70's. Facial hair was the fashion of the time and it comes as a surprise to me that this incident was racially driven due to the fact that Milton had a mustache and a goatee and was required to get rid of it to stay on the team while many of his white teammates had the long sideburns, but they were not required to shave.
ReplyDeleteI do believe that Gaudium fits in your article, the reason being is that when he was suspended, he was being oppressed by not allowing him to have a style that many of his white teammates were not punished while he was suspended after arguing with the coach and I do believe that the coach overstepped his authority.
I agree that the suspension might have been racial driven due to the statement that other white player had sideburns, etc. Also, I agree with Milton on the fact that the suspension violated his human rights. No entity should have a say in what is on your body. In relation to the Gaudium et spes, i feel he was being oppressed and possible targeted while his white counterparts were not burdened by the same rule that led to his suspension.
Delete